In early 1997, I accompanied
a US Assistant Secretary of Defense in face-to-face negotiations with a Russian
minister in Moscow. Our closed-door meeting had only 4 people in the room: my
Assistant Secretary; the Russian minister; an interpreter; and, me.
At that time, the US enjoyed
huge economic and military advantages over Russia.
The US economy was booming
with the Dow Jones average reaching an all-time high. The Russian economy was
in tatters. Only one year later the Russian government would devalue the Ruble
and default on its debt.
The US military was just 6
years removed from destroying Iraq’s Russian-supplied weapons in Operation
Desert Storm. America’s stealth and precision monopolies were the envy of the
world. Russia’s military was a comparative wreck. It had just absorbed a second
wave of massive post-USSR reductions; training was practically non-existent.
Despite these disparities, the
Russian minister in 1997 would not compromise. He would not negotiate. The
concept of “cost-benefit ratio” seemed alien to him. The Russian refused to
give up anything if it resulted in any cost to Russia, however intangible that
cost might be. He was like a boxer who will take 10 shots to the head in order
to get inside to land one shot of his own. His message? Just because Russia was
weak did NOT mean Russians weren’t tough.
Fast forward to 2014 and
Crimea. Promises and threats of economic benefits or sanctions will NOT drive
Russia to reverse course. As George Kennan wrote in 1946, “deep and powerful
currents of Russian nationalism” are “impervious to the logic
of reason, and highly sensitive to the logic of force.” Russia will only reverse course if forced to do so.
Force is the only currency
Moscow will accept – and this is too high a price for Kiev to pay. Unwilling to
resort to force, Ukraine has accepted Russia’s will. It is difficult to imagine
why the United States should pay the price of force for Crimea when Ukrainians
are unwilling to pay it themselves. Mother Russia may be weak, but it remains a
tough mother.
No comments:
Post a Comment